faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Will the FreeQt foundation actually work?
by Ian Monroe on Monday 28/Jan/2008, @07:03
|
There was a GPL Qt3 port to Windows. Basically the Qt framework is obviously modular to allow it to be ported to other platforms. So if you have Qt/X11, it's not too much work to make Qt/Mac or Qt/Windows.
In reality Nokia is a hardware company not a software company, so I see them becoming even more free about handing out licenses to Qt. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Will the FreeQt foundation actually work?
by alzheimer on Monday 28/Jan/2008, @07:20
|
> So if you have Qt/X11, it's not too much work to make Qt/Mac or Qt/Windows.
Oh it's much work alright. A lot work actually
> ...so I see them becoming even more free about handing out licenses to Qt.
Okay... I don't.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Will the FreeQt foundation actually work?
by Nach on Monday 28/Jan/2008, @12:30
|
I personally tried out the Qt3 port to Windows from X11, it was pretty bad, had all kinds of obscure bugs all over the place.
For example, launch another application with QProcess, and watch not being able to control the child process properly on Windows, and having memory leak all over the place.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
