Highly unlikely

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Highly unlikely
by Drol on Monday 28/Jan/2008, @10:39

How could they get a better product than gtk+/maemo but purchasing QT? It makes no sense as QT is worse option. Not technically but in the big picture. Technically QT is respectable. It just attracts people who do not have the slightest clue about GUI designing - KDE folks and alike :-(

Related Links

·   Articles on Qt
·   Also by Drol
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Highly unlikely
by Anon on Monday 28/Jan/2008, @10:47

" It just attracts people who do not have the slightest clue about GUI designing - KDE folks and alike :-("

Don't be ridiculous. What possible property of Qt could make it unappealing to companies with a usability team?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Highly unlikely
by jospoortvliet on Monday 28/Jan/2008, @11:18

Your nick says it all - drol = shit in dutch... Makes sense, as you talk like that.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Highly unlikely
by Henrik Pauli on Monday 28/Jan/2008, @14:42

I’ve seen quite a few terrible UIs written in… well, every toolkit, so whatever. Yes, Gnome has problems too, believe it or not.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Feature freeze: You're allowed to add new bugs, but no new features." -- Richard J. Moore
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.