Re: Novell's policies

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Novell's policies
by T. J. Brumfield on Wednesday 06/Feb/2008, @09:44

The Novell MS deal was announced as a means to work cross-platform between the two companies, and yet they aren't doing that in the least.

Novell got a pay day, and a reprieve from possible litigation.

MS got a bargaining chip to hang over everyone else's heads. Look Novell paid to license patents, and anyone else who hasn't might be sued! This deal was classic FUD.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by T. J. Brumfield
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Novell's policies
by blacky on Wednesday 06/Feb/2008, @10:01

ŤThe Novell MS deal was announced as a means to work cross-platform between the two companies, and yet they aren't doing that in the least.ť

From some talking with a few OpenOffice Novell developers, it does seem like there is cooperation. Both in the support of Office Open XML, and in the Windows OO.o builds.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Novell's policies
by JRT on Wednesday 06/Feb/2008, @20:54

The missing piece of the Novell puzzle is the WordPerfect suit. Prior to the deal with MS, Novell was still persuing legal action regarding the illegal restraint of trade by MS in connection with WordPerfect (as documented in the US vs. MS). I have not been able to find any information regarding the current status of this lawsuit.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Novell's policies
by elsewhere on Thursday 07/Feb/2008, @13:05

>>I have not been able to find any information regarding the current status of this lawsuit.

Then you haven't really looked hard enough, google is your friend.

A couple of weeks ago MS filed a petition with the Supreme Court to have the lawsuit quashed, the story was carried in much of the tech media. A response from the court is due Feb 11.

Novell specifically stated at the time of the MS/Novell deal that the Wordperfect lawsuit would continue and was specifically excluded from the agreement.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Novell's policies
by JRT on Thursday 07/Feb/2008, @23:53

Thanks. I'v been busy being ill. I get CW & ET email news letters, but I must have missed it.

Yes, I read that it would continue at the time of the deal, and then it dropped off the radar.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Novell's policies
by S on Friday 08/Feb/2008, @10:08

Agreed. They didn't even make NTFS file support. The open source world did.

Also is it just me, or did they quietly kill XEN - virtualization off. (doesn't Microsoft have a similar product?? *I wonder*)

I haven't really seen any obvious benefit from the deal. To either parties really.

Life support for Novell? That's all I can think about.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"My hobbies include, well, coding... and uhm... that's about it." -- Daniel M. Duley
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.