Re: Nepomuk use case

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Nepomuk use case
by Lee on Sunday 10/Feb/2008, @13:21

Yep, agreed. It's a tough balance to find. Nepomuk's APIs have a really nice simplicity to them though, so I'm confident that development will catch up soon enough :) One thing that would really help though, is better documentation. The examples on techbase are great, but there aren't many of them, and they're fairly limited in terms of use cases. I haven't yet seen any examples of soprano/nepomuk use from python/ruby/kross -- don't even know if any of those bindings are implemented yet.

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by Lee
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"It's Friday the 13th, so, I thought it appropriate for me to commit this now." -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.