Re: Mono

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Mono
by Riddle on Sunday 17/Feb/2008, @18:28

It's the extra dependency, slowdown, and lack of real advantage. In GNOME, I can understand why using those languages would make sense (the syntax), but for KDE (better syntax), there is no advantage. It also slows it down, and adds another dependency (the runtime.) I don't mind making bindings to those languages (for example, lets say your a company making a cross-platform app and you only want to compile once), but the core modules should not need it.

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by Riddle
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I always have things in progress." -- Kurt Granroth
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.