Re: Light-weight office suite?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Light-weight office suite?
by Kevin Krammer on Friday 22/Feb/2008, @10:38

> Really? That would be SO COOL!!! Where are the packages?

This work has been rejected by Mozilla, therefore it is no longer being worked on.

There is no point in working on something that will not be accepted by the application maintainers unless you intend to fork and forking a browser when you already have one isn't wise either.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Office Suite
·   Also by Kevin Krammer
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Light-weight office suite?
by T. J. Brumfield on Friday 22/Feb/2008, @22:04

Really?

Firefox used to have a QT branch back in the Firefox 1.5 days and they objected to the branch before. Firefox has tons of config options and branches, and I mean tons.

If someone wrote the code, then post it.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Light-weight office suite?
by Grósz Dániel on Saturday 23/Feb/2008, @04:36

Another option is to develop the Qt version parallelly with the official branch and merge the changes of every new version. Of course this would need extra maintainence work.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Man, that new web site is pretty nice." -- Miguel de Icaza
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.