Re: Damn!

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Damn!
by Luis on Wednesday 27/Feb/2008, @14:17

I don't see so much complaint. But it seems that it is indeed true that some people do not need KDE PIM.

Do not take me wrong here. The KDE PIM team makes an awesome job only voluntarily and we can only thank them for that. I used to be a happy user of KMail. I must admit however that since I started with Gmail, Kmail has dissapeared from my computer. Actually I don't think I use any application related to KDE PIM. From what I read, I am not the only one in this situation.

If it was for me to choose, KDE PIM would be pretty much at the very end of my list of priorities for development for KDE 4.1. Some other people may find it more important. Of course it is not for me to choose. And people are free to program whatever they feel like. Especially if they are not being paid. But I think there is some value is finding out in these posts what the priorities are for the everage users.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE PIM
·   Also by Luis
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Sorry, security is not optional." -- Waldo Bastian
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.