Re: KOffice

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: KOffice
by Boudewijn Rempt on Wednesday 27/Feb/2008, @23:13

Right now, about a dozen.

Related Links

·   Articles on Community and Events
·   Also by Boudewijn Rempt
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KOffice
by Anon on Wednesday 27/Feb/2008, @23:29

(At most one of which are paid - contrast with OO.o's sprawling and horrific codebase, which has about *50 *full-time* programmers working on it).

A really sad mis-allocation of funds if you ask me: if I was rich, I'd definitely be putting money into KOffice rather than OO.o. It's amazing how far the KOffice team have come on a non-existent budget, and a real testament to how good the devs and underlying technologies are.

Keep up the excellent work, KOffice devs! :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KOffice
by j on Thursday 28/Feb/2008, @01:52

50? There are about 10 full-time folks in o.org from SUN and who knows how many in Novell (not counting marketing and lawyers ;) ). You can find not that many commiters with 2000+ commits (http://www.ohloh.net/projects/29/contributors). Most of the code still comes from closed source development at StarDivision.

Thanks for the offer and we all are waiting for you when you got rich :)

est. KOffice project cost: $16,478,614 ;)
(http://www.ohloh.net/projects/3802)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KOffice
by AC on Thursday 28/Feb/2008, @03:59

According to this http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2005/09/opening_the_potential_of_openo.html

it's 1 RedHat, 80 Sun, and 8 Novell developer. So by now it will probably be more than that.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KOffice
by j on Thursday 28/Feb/2008, @10:57

They most likely count the translation teams and we are not. 100k LOC per dev could mean a lot of code nearly unmaintained too.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KOffice
by Boudewijn Rempt on Thursday 28/Feb/2008, @13:27

I doubt they count the translation teams either when talking about numbers of developers. About 120 developers for OpenOffice sounds about right to me -- it's what I'd expect for a codebase of that size.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KOffice
by j on Friday 29/Feb/2008, @00:15

"[120] it's what I'd expect for a codebase of that size."

But much of the code has been provided by StarDivision. The question is about actual # of devs, not history. While oo.org 2.0 alpha/beta stage, the team has been complaining about shortage of manpower.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KOffice
by richlv on Friday 29/Feb/2008, @03:38

my guess - that includes testing, user experience and whatnot teams as well.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"KDE is much too well-structured for this world..." -- Rob Buis
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.