faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Zayed on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @09:45
|
| I hope by the time for release kde 4.1 WebKit part will be in very good shape. I want to see what it can provide me which KHML can not. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Anon on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @09:50
|
Or what it can't provide you with that KHTML can.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by amonymous on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @10:18
|
For one thing working google apps... right now gmail, reader and others don't work well on konqueror :(
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Kevin Krammer on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @10:24
|
Ah, but wouldn't you still use Konqueror, thus still being mistreated by Google's browser check?
Do you think web "developers" will magically learn to check for engines instead of browsers?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Zayed on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @10:35
|
Do you mean if I let konqueror pretend like Firefox all the Google applications will work smoothly ?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Level1 on Monday 10/Mar/2008, @09:59
|
No.
Try using gmail in konqueror sometime. Its very buggy and not very useful. I love konqueror, but any time I have to log into my gmail account I use firefox.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by SadEagle on Monday 10/Mar/2008, @10:19
|
I haven't seen any bug reports to that effect lately.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by mactalla on Monday 10/Mar/2008, @10:25
|
I've found I need to spoof as Firefox 1.0.x for Gmail to work correctly. Spoofing as 1.5 or 2.0 doesn't seem to work.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by blueget on Monday 10/Mar/2008, @01:22
|
Yes, but when you have the Webkit Kpart enabled, you should better pretend that your're Safari.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Channi on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @10:49
|
but there is no such problem because QtWebKit allways pretends to be Safari running on Mac OS X!
In my logs I see:
"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/523.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3 Qt"
It's neat because that way all the sites work because they think its Safari on Macintosh!
I wonder why Konqueror developers never thought of that?
Just pretend to be a popular browser and sites work better...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by dr on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @11:38
|
> I wonder why Konqueror developers never thought of that?
> Just pretend to be a popular browser and sites work better...
they did - settings | configure | browser identification
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Kevin Kofler on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @11:49
|
And this means server statistics will show you all as Mac users instead of GNU/Linux users. I don't think that's a good idea, it will destroy our market share estimates completely. As GNU/Linux is rarely sold in retail, the web server statistics are one of the best estimates we can get.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Terracotta on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @13:18
|
mhm, so that's the reason why apple's releasing safari on windows, to let businesses think they have a bigger marketshare than do actually do...
Well, as long as the sites work properly, and I do believe developers will work better if they have to try to be compatible to three browser engines instead of two, I am glad enough.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Sebastian Sauer on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @13:39
|
3? did we went one step future and also exclude Opera now? :-(
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by SadEagle on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @13:43
|
Opera is semi-excluded --- they have extensive features to work around broken
sites, in fact.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|