faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by SadEagle on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @12:02
|
| I am not exactly sure of what you're getting at here. KHTML has a very rich API as is, and had it for years. No reason for apps like Plasma and Amarok not to use it (well, if there are reason, they sure as heck didn't communicate them to us). |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
Over 40 comments listed.
Printing out index only. |
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Sebastian Sauer on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @12:46
|
nope, there are really no reasons. It's even damn easy to just decide at runtime. It works btw already pretty fine to embed KHTML into the Plasma-desktop: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Development/Tutorials/SuperKaramba#Embed_KHTML_Webbrowser
:)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by phD student that should stop reading the dot on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @15:14
|
I believe that Plasma is about the use of QGraphics*
So is it possible to display KHTML on the canvas like Webkit ?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Re: webkit in konqueror!
by Kevin Kofler on Sunday 09/Mar/2008, @18:26
|
What I'm getting at is that they're written to use the QtWebKit API for whatever reasons, so if we want them to be able to use KHTML, we have to either patch them or emulate the API they're using.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|