Re: akademy2008 logo sucks.

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: akademy2008 logo sucks.
by Amazon on Thursday 13/Mar/2008, @07:57

Probably suggested before, but I think a slashdot-like moderation system would be good.

The "everything sucks"-posts gets too much attention, especially since it's usually one of the first posts.

Related Links

·   Articles on Community and Events
·   Also by Amazon
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: akademy2008 logo sucks.
by sebas on Friday 14/Mar/2008, @03:56

I think that makes a lot of sense. I wouldn't want to restrict posting, or even delete posts like the one we're all referring to, but on the other hand, we're making it far too easy for those people that only want to do harm to the project to do so. You just post your crap asap after a new article is published and everybody will read it :/

The dot is also our main news channel, so a lot of people read it. Having those trolls FIPOing doesn't make for a good first impression and it certainly doesn't reflect correctly on the KDE community.

I'd very much like a moderation system for the Dot. Unfortunately, no active development has happened on the Dot for years, so it won't happen by itself. :-(

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: akademy2008 logo sucks.
by Sepp on Friday 14/Mar/2008, @04:20

I'm not a big fan of the Slashdot moderation system.
A few years ago I was reading Slashdot quite often, wrote comments and moderated from time to time. My feeling was that moderation was abused frequently, just because of different opinions. And I don't want to see the day, someone gets modded down on the Dot, just because he/she prefers GNOME.
The admins of Slashdot were aware of this issue and introduced "Metamoderation", which clearly shows that moderation has failed miserably.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: akademy2008 logo sucks.
by sebas on Friday 14/Mar/2008, @07:10

For those that are not incredibly familiar with the Slashdot system, can you eplain shortly how metamoderation works?

All in all, it's certainly a trade-off. I wouldn't want to see those obvious trolls on top of the page, but of course moderation comes at a price. It just makes it harder to game the system, but not impossible.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: akademy2008 logo sucks.
by Sepp on Friday 14/Mar/2008, @08:09

from http://slashdot.org/faq/metamod.shtml

"Metamoderation is a second layer of moderation. It seeks to address the issue of unfair moderators by letting "metamoderators" (any logged-in Slashdotter) "rate the rating" of ten randomly selected comment posts. The metamoderator decides if the moderator's rating was fair, unfair, or neither."

That's how they tried to get rid of unfair moderators. But I think there are not enough Dot-readers to make that work.

I think this whole system didn't perform well, since many posts got modded down, just because the moderator didn't agree with the point the poster made.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"In my free time I try to avoid computers as far as possible." -- Matthias Elter
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.