Re: Still using butt ugly fonts

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Still using butt ugly fonts
by Gogs on Monday 17/Mar/2008, @03:26

I would disagree. This thread is about progress being made in KDE aka Commit Digest. I would say that poor fonts don't represent progress, therefore it would be legitimate to point that out on this thread.

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by Gogs
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Still using butt ugly fonts
by Matt Williams on Monday 17/Mar/2008, @03:44

But you can't seriously expect all the KDE developers to follow all the threads on all the Dot articles, especially given the signal:noise ratio. Of course, you're free to point it out here but it's unlikely that anything productive will come of it. The mailing list is the correct place to report issues such as this and Bugzila is the place for most other wishlist/bug reports.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Still using butt ugly fonts
by Gogs on Monday 17/Mar/2008, @04:07

No I certainly do not, but having being reading the Commit Digest announcements for a while they do certainly appear to attract their fair share of devs...

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Still using butt ugly fonts
by Bobby on Monday 17/Mar/2008, @04:45

That's true, I have seen even big shots like Aseigo addressing problems on the dot quite a few times even though they might have been posted on Bugzilla or the mailing list.
I have also posted a few problems/bugs (haven't got a Bugzilla account yet) here which have been been dealt with, so yes they (the devs) are on the alert even on the dot ;)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Still using butt ugly fonts
by sebas on Monday 17/Mar/2008, @05:55

That doesn't make it a more suitable medium for doing so. In fact, posting to the right mailinglist helps the developers keeping track of it (so chances increase it gets addressed), increases chances that the right developer even reads it, and it helps developers a great deal by respecting their workflow.

So while sometimes things get picked up from the Dot, it's by no means a preferred, nor suitable, medium to report bugs.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Still using butt ugly fonts
by Bobby on Monday 17/Mar/2008, @05:59

I am aware of that sebas and that's why I am going to get registered on Bugzilla today. Of course I don't have a bug right now but I am sure that one will come ;)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Still using butt ugly fonts
by elsewhere on Friday 21/Mar/2008, @19:18

> I would disagree. This thread is about progress being made in KDE aka Commit Digest. I would say that poor fonts don't represent progress, therefore it would be legitimate to point that out on this thread.

You can't hold the devs accountable for something that is the responsibility of the distros. You may as well complain that KDE doesn't speed up package management. KDE does what it rightly should, and relies on the defaults set in the environment, unless the packagers have altered those defaults. If those don't work well, your criticism is misdirected.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I'm holding out for a computer interface that plugs directly into my cerebral cortex." -- Sirtaj Singh Kang
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.