Re: Still using butt ugly fonts

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Still using butt ugly fonts
by elsewhere on Friday 21/Mar/2008, @19:18

> I would disagree. This thread is about progress being made in KDE aka Commit Digest. I would say that poor fonts don't represent progress, therefore it would be legitimate to point that out on this thread.

You can't hold the devs accountable for something that is the responsibility of the distros. You may as well complain that KDE doesn't speed up package management. KDE does what it rightly should, and relies on the defaults set in the environment, unless the packagers have altered those defaults. If those don't work well, your criticism is misdirected.

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by elsewhere
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"If you have an itch not being scratched, you can scratch it, or pay someone to scratch it for you." -- Eric Laffoon
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.