Re: Insert title here.

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Insert title here.
by anon on Wednesday 26/Mar/2008, @18:34

The article is a bit stupid. For example, compare XP with KDE 3. Xp is what, 7 years old. Of course kde 3. is better than such an old platform. But, still with XP you can use more technology than with KDE, so if given the choice, if I wanted a computer that performed with high quality software I would go with XP, because at the moment the linux applications are still the major let down to linux.

Related Links

·   Articles on Interviews
·   Also by anon
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Insert title here.
by winter on Wednesday 26/Mar/2008, @21:58

Is XP really 7 years old? Then can we count from KDE 3.0? Since I'm sure XP has had upgrades since it was first released. ;)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Insert title here.
by Leo S on Wednesday 26/Mar/2008, @23:10

Xp was released Oct 25, 2001. KDE 3.0 was released April 3, 2002. Both have received updates since then. So that's only just over a 5 month difference. It's perfectly fair to compare them.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Insert title here.
by Sebastian on Thursday 27/Mar/2008, @06:51

But was KDE 3.0 better than XP? 3.5 is better, indeed...
And it would be unfair to compare the release cycles of XP SP 1,2,... with KDE 3.1, 3.2, 3.5 etc. KDE intended to offer a large set of new features within these dot releases while XP service packs intended to update the underlying technology while offering mainly fixes in the desktop area... Even if we know that KDE4 will catch and pass by Vista within the next 12 month easily we still do not know what MS develops under the hood...

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Insert title here.
by Leo S on Thursday 27/Mar/2008, @09:40

>> But was KDE 3.0 better than XP?

Absolutely. XP before service pack 1 was a pretty poor operating system if you recall. Many apps were not compatible, driver support was attrocious, performance on machines of the day was poor, security was absolutely terrible (until SP2 actually).

>> KDE intended to offer a large set of new features within these dot releases while XP service packs intended to update the underlying technology while offering mainly fixes in the desktop area

Not entirely true. Yes, the KDE Desktop got many new features, but most of those new features were in the applications, which happen to be bundled instead of distributed separately like on windows. Similarly, Windows applications got many new features in this timeline. The base kdelibs didn't change so drastically between 3.0 and 3.5, just like the Windows base didn't change drastically either.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Man, that new web site is pretty nice." -- Miguel de Icaza
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.