faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Good and Bad
by Iuri Fiedoruk on Sunday 30/Mar/2008, @06:59
|
| SO, if you have an eee with, let's say, 512 RAM, will it run kde4 faster or slower than 4? |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Good and Bad
by Anon on Sunday 30/Mar/2008, @07:08
|
Depends entirely on what you are doing, obviously - neither KDE3 nor KDE4 with a webbrowser with a few tabs open and a few Kwrite sessions, say, will come close to using 512MB, so the amount of RAM is entirely irrelevant.
If you have more/ more demanding apps open, then KDE4 and its apps will push you into swap faster than KDE3, which will slow things down when switching apps. Assuming an app is fully loaded into RAM, though, then again, the amount of RAM is completely irrelevant.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Good and Bad
by Iuri Fiedoruk on Sunday 30/Mar/2008, @14:13
|
And it's important to remember linux/kde is much less resource hunger than Winodws Vista, but still a bit over XP (in my humble testing case) :)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: Good and Bad
by Whatever Noticed on Sunday 30/Mar/2008, @14:48
|
i have kde4 on my laptop with opensuse 10.3 and 256 mb ram (of which 128 mb is shared video memory), and kde4 does indeed run faster than kde3.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|