Re: Bad promotion

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Bad promotion
by Pol on Saturday 29/Mar/2008, @10:59

Can you please elaborate a bit?
As an end-user, confronting concepts about 'good linux distributions' is appealing.

Related Links

·   Articles on Interviews
·   Also by Pol
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Bad promotion
by Morty on Saturday 29/Mar/2008, @13:30

Several of the modifications they make to KDE are less than well thought out. They are supposed to be some kind of usability improvements, but in most cases it's only removal of functionality whitout any real gain in usability.

But I find the most telling is when you watch Bugzilla, it seem like it has a higher amount of distribution specific bugs than other distributions. Bugs that don't exist if you compile KDE from source or use other distributions.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Bad promotion
by Bobby on Saturday 29/Mar/2008, @21:17

Install KUbuntu, PCLinuxOS and openSuse 10.3 on the same computer, all running KDE and then you will understand what I mean.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Being part of KDE is quite a character building experience." -- Matthias Ettrich
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.