Re: Version numbers

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Version numbers
by Gilles Caulier on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @14:16

This subject have been already discuted on digiKam mailing list. I'm not favorable to toogle now to 1.0.0 version... A fondamental feature is not yet implemented : a powerfull backup/restore tool.

Gilles Caulier

Related Links

·   Articles on Applications
·   Also by Gilles Caulier
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Version numbers
by Vide on Sunday 06/Apr/2008, @10:59

With all the respect due, and even if others "pro" apps on other platform have this fuction, I don't think this is what makes Digikam a 1.0 program or just a 0.10. Backup/restore policies should be something outside the scope of a user program and should be part of the "operating system".
What's my point? That Digikam is such a great program and that the KDE4 port will be a gigantic leap that deserve a 1.0 version in any case :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"It's Friday the 13th, so, I thought it appropriate for me to commit this now." -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.