faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Anon on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @11:41
|
I agree. It feels like 4.0.x is a waste of time both for developer and users.
They should keep it as close as possible to KDE 4.1, so stuff get tested and we get a quality release in summer. There is no point in developers wasting time to maintain 4.0.x and backport stuff to it. Nobody uses 4.0 in a production environment and it's not a real stable release. As you say, if users can cope with 4.0, they'll cope with 4.1 alpha and beta. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Anon2 on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @12:18
|
The first time I read your post, it seemed kinda harsh.
But the more I think about it, the more truth I see: Nobody wanting to use a stable desktop will use KDE 4.0.x - in this case KDE 3.5.9 is the way to go. KDE 4.0.x is a beta version (there's no flaming here, as that's more or less the official line, can be read in various blogs of developpers).
So basically, we're talking about a work-in-progress, and maintaining a KDE 4.0.x besides developping KDE4 seems as sensible as maintaining an early beta version of a program.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Anon2 on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @12:29
|
Oops, something lost here:
Maintaining KDE 4.0.x besides developping KDE 4.1 seems as sensible as maintaining an early beta version parallel to a newer beta version.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
How many ?
by Bobby on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @12:43
|
Anons do we have? We have Anon (original afaik) then we have anon and now Anon2. What's next? Anon reloaded?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by NabLa on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @15:15
|
Well, your mileage may vary... I've been using KDE4 nonstop since 4.0.1 (4.0.0 was too unstable for me). Apart from the obvious defects, 4.0.2 is quite stable. My biggest annoyances are krunner (after executing successfully a command it complains it couldn't do it) and kwin (way too slow in composite mode).
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by NabLa on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @15:19
|
I see on 4.0.3's changelog that some effort has been made to optimise kwin on nvidia, let's see how it goes :)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Jonathan Thomas on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @16:23
|
Seems smoother here on my GeForce 4 MX 440. (It wasn't half bad before either)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by MarcG on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @01:49
|
Not smooth at all on my Geforce 6600GT. Drives me nuts, have to use compiz.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by reihal on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @09:11
|
Since the MX 440 is much older, slower and have less memory,
it's another driver you have to use.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by NabLa on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @09:45
|
Still slow for me, no improvement :? I have a similar card with latest nvidia drivers...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
NVIDIA fixes?
by Sebastian on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @04:11
|
I read your post and decided to install 4.0.3
Surprising result when measuring frame rate on 8400GT using glxgears:
kde 4.0.2: 8300 frames in 5.0 seconds
kde 4.0.3: 4617 frames in 5.0 seconds
half the performance.
I have to file a bug report on that...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: NVIDIA fixes?
by Sebastian on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @08:50
|
No, even less. The first reduction appeared after installing 4.0.3, killing kwin4.0.2 and starting kwin 4.0.3.
After restarting the session I am at 1500 frames per 5.0 seconds...
wow! this is as fast as my old ATI wothout 3d support! May somebody explain this? Shall I see this as a sign (I will exeggerate) that kwin is making the gpu busy or is it a good sign (in terms that kwin now uses the gpu at all)?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Aaron Seigo on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @08:42
|
> krunner (after executing successfully a command it complains it couldn't do it)
for the record, this bug is not in krunner but elsewhere =)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Leo S on Friday 04/Apr/2008, @11:12
|
The debian KDE packagers agree with you. They are skipping 4.0.X>2 entirely and packaging KDE trunk builds until 4.1 is released.
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-chinese-gb@lists.debian.org/msg16211.html
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
debian is snobing kde 4.0.x
by mimoune djouallah on Friday 04/Apr/2008, @11:30
|
i think (imho) as a user, it is the right decision, i am really concerned about the reaction of users after using kde 4.0.x specially plasma (btw the most important piece in kde), let's wait and see their reaction to fedora 9, ubuntu 8.04-kde4 and in less extend opensuse 11 ( i really hope they postponed their release date and ship kde 4.1 bata )
it is always hard to forget the first impression ;)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Iuri Fiedoruk on Sunday 06/Apr/2008, @08:01
|
I tought the contrary.
But as most bugfixes are NOT being ported to 4.0 series, and plasma just crashes everyday for me (on logout and sometimes on login), I just want 4.1 stable and with more features. Having to maintain 4.0 series does not help to improve 4.1, so please, kde tem, do not work on 4.0.4-beta, we want 4.1-stable!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Kevin Kofler on Sunday 06/Apr/2008, @08:21
|
> please, kde tem, do not work on 4.0.4-beta
I disagree, please do backport bugfixes! I really don't want to have to backport dozens of bugfixes from 4.1 all alone for Fedora 9's KDE 4.0.4 update which is going to come a few days after the release. Please keep users of the stable branch in mind and backport bugfixes to the stable branch whenever possible. With that logic, i.e. if all the bugfixes go to the unstable trunk only, we'll never have a stable release.
This:
> most bugfixes are NOT being ported to 4.0 series
if it's true (I don't have any metrics to decide either way), is the real problem and should really not happen. But dropping 4.0 entirely is not the solution, actually backporting bugfixes is!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by phD student that should stop reading the dot on Wednesday 02/Apr/2008, @14:00
|
The question is how trunk get more stable ?
By all users testing and using what is kde 4.0.
So the state of kde 4.1 is so good because some use kde 4.0.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Emil Sedgh on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @00:50
|
and the answer is: i think developers are users too :)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by Aaron Seigo on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @08:45
|
it's a numbers thing: both the number of users as well as the number of different ways the system is used. developers involved with a system tend to use the software in repeated, predictable patterns. introduce new users (even if they are also developers, but of some other software) and issues start to arise pretty naturally / obviously.
that said, i'm happy to see the 4.0.x releases rolling. it's a good practice and the improvements are welcome by many.
counterballancing that, yes, i'm very much of the "concentrate on 4.1 as much as possible (but no more)" opinion as well.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: only bug fixes for plasma ?
by ad on Thursday 03/Apr/2008, @12:56
|
That is because 4.0 is in essence a Beta release. And as a Beta release it is, it doesn't make that much sense for it to have bugfix releases, the best way to make it stable is to continue development towards a Release Candidate state, which is being done in the 4.1 branch.
If you look at Plasma in 4.0 for, which is central to the end user experience, it is far from done, that's why it is allowed to introduce new features in supposedly bugfix releases. Libplasma won't even remain binary compatible until 4.1. All this are characteristics of Beta releases.
Of course 4.1 is more prone to break than 4.0 but, since so many improvements have been done over that old Beta state, it's natural that overall it is better quality.
I know this is beating a dead horse. In any case it is the natural answer for these kind of comments. From the moment that you keep in mind that 4.0 is Beta, lots of strange things suddenly make sense.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
