Re: Webkit?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Webkit?
by Grósz Dániel on Friday 04/Apr/2008, @13:28

"KHTML or WebKit does it really matter?"

It does because if we use QtWebKit, (even if it is not absolutely compatible with the Safari WebKit) the websites tested in Safary will be likely to work in Konqueror as well, and Safari has much bigger market share than Konqueror.

I think Konqueror should be rewritten (in the same powerful but more flexible way) because developers often say that Konqueror code is such a mess that adding even small features is painful. If KHTML improves (as it continually does) and a decent web browser based on it is written that runs on Windows and Mac OS X as well, it could enter the browser war and gain enough market share to be noticed by website developers.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by Grósz Dániel
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Webkit?
by Morty on Friday 04/Apr/2008, @15:32

"the websites tested in Safary will be likely to work in Konqueror as well"

That may be, but the waste majority of sites I see that Konqueror has serious problems works when changing user agent. It's not the testing by web developers and the rendering of KHTML that is the issue, so changing to WebKit will not change this.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"The trolls are only human and make mistakes too." -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.