Re: wikipedia isn't that hot these days

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: wikipedia isn't that hot these days
by Yeap on Friday 04/Apr/2008, @10:48

I second that

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by Yeap
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: wikipedia isn't that hot these days
by nikos on Friday 04/Apr/2008, @11:40

Wikipedia is not to be trusted!
A wikipedian bureaucracy has been created,
under the blessing of the owners (of course).
I would rather use "bad" language to describe wikipedia,
but I don't, only out of respect to this site.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: wikipedia isn't that hot these days
by Kerr Avon on Saturday 05/Apr/2008, @14:13

I emphatically agree.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I switch between vi and xemacs quite a lot. I'm happy with both." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.