Re: wikipedia may be inaccurate, KDE is not.

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: wikipedia may be inaccurate, KDE is not.
by Martin Fitzpatrick on Saturday 05/Apr/2008, @04:13

Agreed, I'm actually impressed a lot of the time on Wikipedia articles where they attempt to give equal balance to two sides of history of a contentious issue. The talk pages are always interesting - almost as useful a reference as the pages themselves.

Nobody is every going to agree on everything. If we can get the arguments out there in public, and present both sides fairly and equally, that's a good thing.

It's not perfect, but it's probably the best we've had.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by Martin Fitzpatrick
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I don't sing in the shower... I play the piano though." -- David Faure
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.