Re: wikipedia may be inaccurate, KDE is not.

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: wikipedia may be inaccurate, KDE is not.
by sebas on Sunday 06/Apr/2008, @09:59

You (and others) are unfortunately totally missing the point. Whether Wikipedia is accurate in all places is irrelevant here.

Think about this: I would've been deeply surprised hearing from the Wikipedia community that they shouldn't work together with KDE because KDE contains bugs. Hell, yes we do. KDE has lots of bugs. There is no such thing as "perfect". Well, maybe there is for software (though I strongly doubt that), there surely is not for "truth", "history" and "knowledge".

Now take a step back and realise that it's not about products (Wikipedia / KDE vs. Wikimedia e.V. / KDE e.V.). Wikimedia' e.V.'s mission is to promote the creation of Free knowledge knowledge. KDE e.V.'s mission is to support the creation of Free Desktop software.

Seriously, sometimes I wonder if they had been right rejecting our collaboration based on the stupidity and lack of vision of some people commenting on the Dot.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by sebas
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"If there is smoke, there could be a fire." -- Konqi
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.