The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Comments on the dot
by Mark Kretschmann on Monday 07/Apr/2008, @23:09
|
100% agree. Disabling AC's, and maybe adding a moderation system.
We might just give Slashcode a try, it does all of that and more.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Comments on the dot
by Boudewijn Rempt on Monday 07/Apr/2008, @23:46
|
or do what LWN does and only allow paying subscribers to post comments -- that would help out two ways :-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Comments on LWN.net
by gek on Tuesday 08/Apr/2008, @08:42
|
LWN.net _does_ allow comments from non-subscribers as "guests". However, if you cannot read an article meant (initially) for subscribers, you cannot comment on it, can you? :-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: Comments on the dot
by Martin Fitzpatrick on Tuesday 08/Apr/2008, @06:48
|
Agreed. I posted something to this effect on the linked blog from the Digest. Anonymous posting is only needed when people are going to be "outing" something or posting on dangerous/contentious issues. The dot isn't for that... and I think removing the option to hide behind Anonymous postings would make people think a little harder about what they say.
I know it works for me anyway.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Comments on the dot
by Anon :) on Wednesday 09/Apr/2008, @08:38
|
"What I would like to see is anonymous comments disabled, with an account required to post. This would also stop impersonation of posters."
+1
and also possibility of removing topic which is totally offtopic and also trolling.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Comments on the dot
by Anon :) on Wednesday 09/Apr/2008, @08:48
|
Then "Compositioning effects wishlist =)" from this digest could be removed, it is just stupid offtopic
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|