faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: no proxy, no amarok
by mimoune djouallah on Sunday 13/Apr/2008, @09:40
|
| eah, perhaps this bug need to be fixed, don't you think so ?, i already filled a bug report against systemesetting about this issue, i really don't know if i wrote something wrong that upset you ? |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: no proxy, no amarok
by Dan on Sunday 13/Apr/2008, @11:03
|
It has nothing to do with Amarok.
This article is about amarok.
Whining about a bug in a very early port of kde in the comments of an article dedicated to progress in Amarok is rude. Don't do it.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: no proxy, no amarok
by Thomas on Sunday 13/Apr/2008, @11:59
|
please calm down.. you're a bit overreacting here. it's very much a valid point to point out some shortcomings with the (early) windows port of KDE+Amarok. And the style of writing suggests it was shurely not meant as a rude bashing...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: no proxy, no amarok
by Ian Monroe on Sunday 13/Apr/2008, @12:56
|
It especially doesn't have much to do with Amarok, since I bet phonon-ds9 backend does have proxy support since its using DirectX. So you could play streams fine. (though web services would be b0rked).
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: no proxy, no amarok
by mimoune djouallah on Wednesday 16/Apr/2008, @02:23
|
ok you are right it has nothing to do with amarok, proxy in kde is still broken, and under windows to configure proxy is as simple as kcmshell4 proxy.
ok i am just a stupid user.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|