faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Awesome!
by she on Wednesday 16/Apr/2008, @03:41
|
"QT was free, it IS still free, but now the "free" way is lead by nokia ^^."
Wrong. Qt itself was not free, they always had a commercial license which one had to get when one wanted to use it. (For closed source apps for example)
Back then the dependence on Trolltech was one main reason why Gnome was started (and it is now funny that they wanted to incorporate C#/Mono stuff... probably they get paid)
KDE on the other hand was always free in the sense of "free". They even have a clause that when Qt would ever become non-free as such, KDE could continue (and fork the latest non free part too)
Just because Nokia bought Trolltech doesnt mean that Trolltech changes its agenda.
You cant say this without looking at the FACTS, and so far I believe Nokia has hardly done ANYTHING, they just seemed happy with the acquisition. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Awesome!
by she on Wednesday 16/Apr/2008, @03:41
|
Sorry, not to "use" it. Using it was easy.
But to "develop apps with QT" one needed a license.
That sentence earlier was misleading.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Awesome!
by Janne on Wednesday 16/Apr/2008, @05:37
|
"Wrong. Qt itself was not free, they always had a commercial license which one had to get when one wanted to use it."
Wrong. Since it was also licensed under the GPL, I would say that it most certainly was free. Well, excluding the early history with QPL and the like.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Awesome!
by David Johnson on Wednesday 16/Apr/2008, @22:14
|
The QPL is a free software license. It's just not GPL compatible. But it is still free.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|