Re: Pleased with QtBrowser

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Pleased with QtBrowser
by eds on Wednesday 16/Apr/2008, @22:39

Well, kicker died because all the developers have agreed that it must die, and porting all those kicker applets would be just waste of time. In the case of KHTML, none of KDE developers say KHTML shall die ;)

Well, we just see, whether KHTML will die as what you wish or it will still strive as an alternative rendering engine. With the introduction of KHTML in Windows, I'm sure KHTML will get more market share.

(And safari in Windows is not as good as Safari on Mac, I prefer Firefox over Safari in Windows, and if Konqueror has been stabilize on Windows, surely I'll use Konqueror)

Alternative is good, do you know even there are more smaller open source rendering engines which have smaller market share - even maybe less than 0.001% market share? Like Netsurf for RiscOS, which is quite capable despite it is still very young and ultra-lightweightness.

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by eds
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"If you have an itch not being scratched, you can scratch it, or pay someone to scratch it for you." -- Eric Laffoon
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.