faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Some suggestions
by Anon on Friday 18/Apr/2008, @15:30
|
I see your point, but I have to beg to differ:
Word looks like a W - and a sheet of paper
Excel looks lik a sylized XL on a spreadsheet background
Powerpoint looks like a Piechart which makes people think presentation
Access has a key, which is a symbol for locked/secured data
Outlook looks like a clock - since it's primarily a calendar
Publisher has a big P and looks like a Page layout document.
Even Office newbies understand theses symbols.
Icons/Logos should be self explanatory. Only if the company/product is big and well known it can afford abstract (albeit very, very pretty :) ) meaningless symbols.
I also think that Logos and Icons should be RELATED. That helps a lot.
Please no flame!
Thanks for helping out with ODF btw. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Some suggestions
by rat on Friday 18/Apr/2008, @17:25
|
I think we will have to agree to disagree.
My point is that if I saw a yellow clock, I don't think I would have considered that it was calendar program (outlook), but now that I have seen Outlook and the yellow clock a thousand times, I can associate the two.
>Only if the company/product is big and well known it can afford abstract (albeit very, very pretty :) )
I agree here. No company starts out big. And few companies change their logos significantly (key word) when they do get big.
>I also think that Logos and Icons should be RELATED. That helps a lot.
Definitely agree.
Honestly, I don't know if I'm right or not, but imho, I think the koffice logos are very nice, and I certainly respect the position that they should look more relevant to what the program does, but I just don't agree.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|