faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: wow
by Jonathan Thomas on Tuesday 29/Apr/2008, @17:35
|
| If people using an alpha get mad because Plasma is somewhat broken, then its their own fault. Breakage while implementing new features are what alphas are all about in the software world. (Though in the past we've been spoiled by high-stability KDE pre-releases.) |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
Over 40 comments listed.
Printing out index only. |
Re: wow
by Emil Sedgh on Tuesday 29/Apr/2008, @23:42
|
People using alpha getting mad?
KDE 4.1 Alpha1 is released just to be a preview for 4.1
it 'is' alpha.this is 100% usual that an Alpha software includes broken stuff.this is why its called 'Alpha'.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Re: wow
by Jim on Wednesday 30/Apr/2008, @03:52
|
> If people using an alpha get mad because Plasma is somewhat broken, then its their own fault.
I think the point being made is that Plasma was considered by many to be unfinished by KDE 4.0's release and responsible for a lot of its problems. Everybody unhappy with KDE 4.0 was told that KDE 4.1 was the "real" release, and that KDE 4.0 was just a preview.
So to find out that Plasma is undergoing yet more big changes rather than stabilising just makes a mockery of everybody who was fed the excuses about 4.0 and the promises for 4.1.
> Breakage while implementing new features are what alphas are all about in the software world.
Oh, I was saying that for 4.0. I was told I didn't understand open source and that betas and release candidates are appropriate for breakage while implementing new features too.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|