[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: wow
by Janne on Wednesday 30/Apr/2008, @11:29
"Because the point is not that Plasma is currently unstable, the point is that after telling everybody that 4.0 was the broken release and 4.1 was for stabilisation, they did the exact opposite and went ahead with more major changes to Plasma."

Again: You are whining about alpha-software. That is: software that is nowhere near release. And in case you didn't know, major version-numbers (4.0 ==> 4.1 ==> 4.2 etc.) are for new features and functionality, besides bugfixes. And that is exactly what is happening here. New functionality often bring with it new bugs. But those get sorted out.

"Whether they pull it together and fix things before 4.1 is released is beside the point."

No it is not.

"I'm complaining about the development process, not the software."

Why? What matters is the software that gets developed. I don't care one bit if KDE-coders create 4.1 night before the release, what I care about is the quality of the software that gets released. And alpha-software is way too early to pass judgement regarding the quality of 4.1.0.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on KDE Official News
 ·   Also by Janne
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "KDE is much too well-structured for this world..." -- Rob Buis
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]