[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: KNetworkManager
by Vide on Friday 02/May/2008, @01:47
Don't want to flame here but I really don't understand Novell and Opensuse folk here... why Danny Kukawa (knetworkmanager maintainer, hal developer) simply ignores Solid? KNM, as a KDE4 app, should only rely on Solid, and if something is missing in Solid to make this possible, development should be driven towards this goal. As far as I can tell reading Danny's blog, KDE news etc etc, this is not happening right now. Am I wrong? (I hope I am)
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Developer
 ·   Also by Vide
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KNetworkManager
by jos poortvliet on Friday 02/May/2008, @03:06
Maybe it's just an issue of time... They might get this into solid for KDE 4.1 or 4.2?
[ Reply To This | View ]
Re: KNetworkManager
by Segedunum on Friday 02/May/2008, @06:56
"why Danny Kukawa (knetworkmanager maintainer, hal developer) simply ignores Solid?"

I don't think he is. It's probably just a case of Solid being in a working state where KNM can use that instead of NM directly.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Re: KNetworkManager
by anon on Sunday 04/May/2008, @23:56
that has been answered. Solid is not at a point where OpenSUSE can use it for their upcoming release
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: KNetworkManager
    by Vide on Tuesday 06/May/2008, @04:01
    So why OpenSuse doesn't put some of its employees working on Solid? (well, they could have started months ago, actually). IMO, Solid is something distro should just fall in love with, cause it can make system management integration much simpler.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: KNetworkManager
      by she on Thursday 08/May/2008, @07:53
      I agree, but seriously since Novell took over there was even more coding support for Novell-specific stuff. Fragmenting a community even more.

      With KDE this would be so much better, because KDE is distro-agnostic - if it works on KDE, it will work on distros (with a little bit of tweaking sometimes)
      [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "Never miss an opportunity to throw away code." -- Guillaume Laurent
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]