The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: KNetworkManager
by jos poortvliet on Friday 02/May/2008, @03:06
|
Maybe it's just an issue of time... They might get this into solid for KDE 4.1 or 4.2?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KNetworkManager
by Segedunum on Friday 02/May/2008, @06:56
|
"why Danny Kukawa (knetworkmanager maintainer, hal developer) simply ignores Solid?"
I don't think he is. It's probably just a case of Solid being in a working state where KNM can use that instead of NM directly.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KNetworkManager
by anon on Sunday 04/May/2008, @23:56
|
that has been answered. Solid is not at a point where OpenSUSE can use it for their upcoming release
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KNetworkManager
by Vide on Tuesday 06/May/2008, @04:01
|
So why OpenSuse doesn't put some of its employees working on Solid? (well, they could have started months ago, actually). IMO, Solid is something distro should just fall in love with, cause it can make system management integration much simpler.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KNetworkManager
by she on Thursday 08/May/2008, @07:53
|
I agree, but seriously since Novell took over there was even more coding support for Novell-specific stuff. Fragmenting a community even more.
With KDE this would be so much better, because KDE is distro-agnostic - if it works on KDE, it will work on distros (with a little bit of tweaking sometimes)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|