The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Big thanks to KHTML developers.
by fred on Friday 02/May/2008, @02:45
|
I also notice that. Thanks KHTML devs!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Big thanks to KHTML developers.
by Josep on Monday 05/May/2008, @02:57
|
And much more stable, except for the flash plugin.
I'm happy to come back to Konqueror from QtBrowser.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Big thanks to KHTML developers.
by Blauzahl on Monday 05/May/2008, @17:24
|
(is it worth bothering to post this?)
Using an older version of flash may help. Complaining to Adobe may also help (as to why you're complaining, see Seli's blog, apparently their newest linux version works only in gecko, can you say "browser lock-in"?). With a slightly older version you should be fine unless you're on trunk. Flash 9.0.119 works for me on 4.0 svn branch. So I suspect it would work fine in 4.0.1-4.0.3.
Typing about:plugins in your urlbar will tell you what version you have.
For reporting bugs, please specify if it's repeatable (those are the interesting ones, I'm told), and be detailed in what you did to cause it. There's a lot of duplicate flash bug reports. Feel free to join bugsquad and test various pathological flash websites if you are bored. Be patient, developers know about it.
And remember, you can always kill nspluginviewer.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|