Re: mov?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: mov?
by Jeff Strehlow on Tuesday 06/May/2008, @19:01

I don't agree. I've tried Adobe flashplayer on several Linux distributions and it worked fine on every one of them. The only problem I've had was with a 64-bit install. Even with that I've got it working with a plugin (I believe it called nspluginwrapper in Debian) which makes 32-bit flashplayer work with 64-bit firefox.

And about a year ago I tried gnash and gave up on it because it wasn't stable enough. But I've recently tried the newest version and it's getting pretty decent; I'm using that now instead of flashplayer.

Related Links

·   Articles on Qt
·   Also by Jeff Strehlow
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: mov?
by fhd on Thursday 08/May/2008, @03:16

Okay, so you made it run on ONE architecture. Not even on an architecture that is really very similar to x86 -> x86_64

And you still call it portable? Please look up the word.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: mov?
by Jeff Strehlow on Thursday 08/May/2008, @08:49

You're putting words in my mouth. The only thing I said was that there are 2 flash players to choose from in Linux.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I ride my bicycle." -- Michael Häckel
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.