The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Why so many??
by Amadeo on Friday 09/May/2008, @08:10
|
KOffice has far more volunteer coders than openoffice. What will happen if Sun stops funding openoffice? How many paid developers are required just to maintain it?
KOffice, with a clean and lean code base could save the day in that situation. just look what happened to KHTML x Mozilla.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Volunteers
by T. J. Brumfield on Friday 09/May/2008, @10:01
|
I think OOo lacks volunteers because Sun demands to own the copyright for all submissions, but they do have people like Sun, IBM and Novell paying a decent sized staff to work on OOo.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: Why so many??
by she on Friday 09/May/2008, @09:06
|
'does not really help in practice to attract new developers. '
I dont agree really.
Besides the problem is really that openoffice is an artificial effort right now, marketed by Sun.
Koffice is MUCH more close to the community.
The only problem is that I cant code in C++ (and I wont. I use ruby for all my work). :)
The best solution would be to be as generic as possible and allow people to write plugins etc.. in the language they use. I really have no need for java, c++ or whatever anymore, and I dont want to waste time just for coding in C++ (because I know, I wouldnt code in C++ anyway.).
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Why so many??
by Cyrille Berger on Saturday 10/May/2008, @00:28
|
Well actually with the Kross binding, you can write features in Ruby, Python and JavaScript, either scripts or even dockers. I don't know what you are intersted in doing, but you can do stuff in ruby, and we would really love to have some inputs on the bindings.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|