The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
Over 40 comments listed.
Printing out index only. |
Congrats
by Troy Unrau on Sunday 22/Jun/2008, @09:51
|
Congrats to the openSUSE team on this release, it seems like a good one.
One question: how much of the work put into your plasma modifications has been obsoleted by KDE trunk already, and what (of those changes) will not be going into trunk?
Cheers
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Yast Package Manager
by Kitsune on Sunday 22/Jun/2008, @10:24
|
In the 10.x series the Yast package manager was incredibly slow and forced an update of the repositories every time you updated it. Very good news for people that switch to 11 because now it's FAR faster and you can skip the automatic updates. The openSUSE devs have really done a great job fixing a lot of the annoyances from the 10.x series (the package manager's speed being the worst IMO) and deserve congratulations for such a good release!
A while ago I switched my openSUSE 11 install (technically rc install) over to using the KDE 4.1 development repositories and it's actually *quite* stable, adding several nice features. I believe the amount of improvements in 4.1 over 4.0 should illustrate quite well that the KDE4 series will completely obsolete the 3rd series much sooner than a lot of people would expect for such a massive re-architecting. The entire KDE team does *amazing* work!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Suse
by fooz on Sunday 22/Jun/2008, @11:50
|
Suse is still one of the best distributions for Desktop users who use the KDE technology. But when will OpenSuse be switched to an apt-based package installer? This really keeps me away. YaST is great, the KDE is polished but I still prefer Kubuntu just because of apt.
Do you think the LSB can be helpful to standardize the fundamental architecture?
Just look at this:
http://wiki.winehq.org/LibraryDependencies
Why aren't Linux distributors able to standardize at least the fundament, the naming of standard libraries?
For KDE Suse stands for quality. The advantage of using Vista as an OS is that you can always install the lastest free software and it just runs. Firefox 3 out, you can install it. Under Linux package availability is a problem. And Suse worked very hard to improve the situation. Still I wonder why Linux distributors can't standardize at least the core. What are the advantages of diversity here?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Thanks!
by galarneau on Sunday 22/Jun/2008, @11:59
|
Thanks a lot to all the developers for this release. I installed it yesterday and I feel I'm going to have a lot of fun with it. The new package management rocks!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Good impressions
by suy on Sunday 22/Jun/2008, @15:10
|
I'm having really good impressions with the Live CD. I've never seriously used SuSE, and I'm quite happy with Debian Sid on my Desktop, however, I'm seriously thinking in using OpenSUSE as a recommended distribution for my newbie friends, instead of Kubuntu. I will have to refresh my knowledge of RPM distros (I used Red Hat and Mandrake years ago), but I think that this gorgeous KDE will be worth it. Plasma and Kickoff looked awesome: it all ran smooth, and maybe it was a placebo effect, but I found the styles/themes/colors a bit more distinguishable than with vanilla KDE.
What the hell, I can even try it on my old laptop. How good is the PowerPC port? It's supposed to be the same than on x86(-64)?
Seriously, congratulations to the OpenSuSE team.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Amazing!
by Apple Pi on Sunday 22/Jun/2008, @17:40
|
I had a really great experience installing openSUSE 11.0 (KDE4) on my new laptop... seems much more polished than Kubuntu 8.04.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Disappointed
by rkphil on Sunday 22/Jun/2008, @22:57
|
I loved LiveCD but I've never had this many problems installing a distro. I tried beta 3 and it didn't install at all and wouldn't even load KDE, the initial boot would go straight to windows without showing GRUB etc. Gave the final a shot and again, LiveCD works nice and it was brilliant to see how much KDE 4xx has improved but I had installation errors with the DVD and the CD version installed but then my wired ethernet wouldn't connect and my sound card stopped.
Had installation problems on another machine too. Guess I'll wait till Sidux moves on to 4.xx, really looking forward to it though.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
The best openSUSE ever!
by fhd on Monday 23/Jun/2008, @00:46
|
Seriously, everyone who loves KDE (as a mere user, without svn and cmake) should consider using openSUSE. I've switched after several years of Kubuntu and I can't help but recommend it. You really feel the love they put into beautiful configuration, the ONLY thing I'm wondering is why there's a huge firefox icon on the desktop and no visible way to make it the standard browser.
But really, other than that, I'm 100% satisfied. zypper is great, the artwork is uber, installation and booting is bloody fast and it features the most usable KDE I've ever seen, in version 11 even an everyday usable KDE 4.0!
When using KDE 4.0 back on Kubuntu, it was like a joke. Almost no plasmoids shipped, if, at all, monthly updates, and no more than zero love.
But on openSUSE, I saw the beauty (not only visual) of KDE for the first time with my own eyes rather than on mockups, I love it!
Really, if you're looking for a good KDE distro (KDE 3 is great on SUSE too), try it.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
OpenSUSE vs. MacBook
by Mike Wyatt on Monday 23/Jun/2008, @01:08
|
I tried out the 11.0 livecd and it definitely seems to be a very polished distribution, let alone the best for KDE. The only thing keeping me from using it is that it won't install on a MacBook without the use of rEFIt. I used refit before and it caused serious pains when having to upgrade from tiger to leopard
Ubuntu and fedora install fine, I wish opensuse was the same. also I've always found yast vastly more confusing than kcontrol, and with systemsettings/the solid KCM, redundant
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
No GUI on Dell Latitude C400
by sp1507 on Monday 23/Jun/2008, @06:34
|
I am a new convert to Linux, OpenSuse11 in particular, I tried the live CD on my old Dell Latitude C400( PIII 1.2Ghz, 1GB Ram) for the first time,and it was love at first site, But after installing, there is no GUI only a command prompt login
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Problem with livecd and firewire
by Yves on Monday 23/Jun/2008, @15:50
|
I have a cdrom-drive which is connected via firewire.
When I boot the livecd, it stops very soon in the bootprocess, with the error "Failed to detect CD" in the kiwi installer...
Is there any kernelparameter to make the livecd find the firewire cd drive?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
opensuse 11.0
by susegebr on Wednesday 02/Jul/2008, @10:30
|
The presence of the wireless driver ath5k (not finished prerelease)
are giving trouble when you instal madwifi drivers .
Configuring the card with yast chosing ath0 all go's well until you reboot.
ATH5K is still loaded and gives trouble.
So you have to delete the map ath5k from lib/kernel/drivers/net/wireless
to get a atheros wireless card working right.
Further more you have to add a line in /etc/modprobe.conf "alias ath0 ath_pci"
or the driver won't load, or you have to use modprobe ath_pci in boot.local
On a quad Q6600 processor with 6 gig mem kde4 is slow in starting slow in opening what ever via the menu. Video card is Geforce 8600GT with nvidia 173.09 drivers.
So i deleted kde4 and now KDE 3 is running like a chevey 12 cyl on nitro
Complements for this great version 11.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
KDE 4.1
by Niko Rosvall on Wednesday 09/Jul/2008, @09:51
|
I'm on to install opensuse 11 with KDE. Juts thinking that when KDE 4.1 comes available(released as stable) is it possible to upgrade the opensuse 11 KDE to 4.1? Coming as update? Like firefox 3 beta 5 came firefox 3?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|