Re: KDE2 release schedule update

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: KDE2 release schedule update
by Lenny on Thursday 28/Sep/2000, @04:48

KDE beta3 and I can tell you that there seems to be an endless amount of bugs Sorry, i can not feel pitty about you. Read my lips: _never_ use Beta-Software for prodcution systems. Beta-Software remains beta, even if its open-source. And second: beta3 is some months old, even the latest beta5 is stone age compared against the recent cvs.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by Lenny
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KDE2 release schedule update
by cockney on Thursday 28/Sep/2000, @16:26

We have now up-graded to beta 5 and even the final versions of kde1.0 where not pruduction quality. So what you are saying is that I should never expect a production quality desktop environment from the open source community??

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KDE2 release schedule update
by Haakon Nilsen on Friday 29/Sep/2000, @01:14

He's simply saying it's a very bad idea to run ANY beta software in a production environment. As you seem to be in charge of lots of production computers, this should be basic knowledge. Unless, of course, you have hired 50 people for the sole sake of beta testing KDE2? ;)

KDE 2.0 will NOT be as stable as KDE 1.1.2 was. Likewise, KDE 1.1.2 was a LOT more stable and mature than KDE 1.0. If you didn't find KDE 1.1.2 to be of production quality, then frankly:

1) Try Windows ME instead (maybe Linux is not for you), or
2) Report or fix the bugs, or
3) Try the "other" desktop environment, or
4) Try the commercial Linux CDE (deXtop)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KDE2 release schedule update
by Stefan Heimers on Sunday 01/Oct/2000, @15:54

Users will be disapointed when the released KDE 2.0 is less stable than KDE 1.1.2.

I think what the original poster wanted to say is that you should wait with the anouncement until KDE 2.0 is more stable than KDE1.1.2, where i do agree.

Adding features and neglecting stability is the Microsoft way to do things. An unstable final release of KDE 2 could spoil the reputation of open source. I have coleagues ho already complain, that Linux is not more stable and not faster than Windows (they mean Netscape, kfm 1.x, Staroffice, etc.). You now have the choice to teach them wrong or right!

Bye,
Stefan Heimers

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I'm adding spaces everywhere so that Charles doesn't edit the files." -- Stephan Kulow
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.