faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by Jean-Christophe Fargette on Friday 16/Mar/2001, @03:30
|
I tried Imlib2 (final) for enlightenment-0.17 (alpha version) and I can tell you that it's a lot faster than gdk-pixbuf and imlib1.
Imlib2 is appreciate on my slow computer ;-) |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by Carsten Pfeiffer on Friday 16/Mar/2001, @06:14
|
> I tried Imlib2 (final) for enlightenment-0.17 (alpha version) and I can tell you that it's a lot faster than gdk-pixbuf and imlib1.
>
> Imlib2 is appreciate on my slow computer ;-)
Ohh, Imlib2 is already released? Not a beta? I will certainly use that in the next versions, then.
Cheers,
Carsten
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by oliv on Friday 16/Mar/2001, @08:08
|
Imlib2 1.0.0 was realeased on October 16, 2000.
the latest one, Imlib2 1.0.2 was released on March 2, 2001
More details here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/enlightenment/
and there
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2
Also, avoiding Imlib (1) is good because it's not really maintained, and there has been a fork between Gnomers' version and Raster's version, so getting help for might not be easy in the future.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by Carsten Pfeiffer on Saturday 17/Mar/2001, @03:00
|
Concerning speed of Imlib2... for Enlightenment it might make a difference, due to all the effects, animations etc., but in an imageviewer it does not make a big difference. I did a quick port of KuickShow to Imlib2 and it's not obviously faster.
Don't get me started on the new API :-/
Regarding Imlib1: I've been using many versions and the only requirement ever was to use a version >= 1.5. The Xlib version hardly got any changes at all. That said, I do have problems with 1.9.8 under Openwin (Solaris7) currently :}
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|