faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by reihal on Friday 16/Mar/2001, @04:45
|
I agree, ACDSee rules.
It doesn't use any stinking scrollbars either, it uses the hand cursor to shove the image around.
I wish Konqueror did that! |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by Jelmer Feenstra on Friday 16/Mar/2001, @05:11
|
Hmm, never smelled a thing when using konqueror to view images !
Well, whatever.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by Carsten Pfeiffer on Friday 16/Mar/2001, @06:11
|
> I agree, ACDSee rules.
> It doesn't use any stinking scrollbars either, it uses the hand cursor to shove the image around.
As does KuickShow btw :) The only problem: I don't have a nice handcursor to show, so you have to scroll with the normal arrow cursor :-/
Anyone who can provide a nice handcursor?
Cheers,
Carsten
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by reihal on Friday 16/Mar/2001, @15:34
|
He, that was fast.
The hand should be Konqi's green, three-fingered hand, ofcourse.
(I don't like various bars stealing precious screen space)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by Carsten Pfeiffer on Saturday 17/Mar/2001, @03:03
|
> The hand should be Konqi's green, three-fingered hand, ofcourse.
Excellent idea :) Cursors in X can only have two colors tho :} Anyone feel like creating a bitmap of konqi's hand?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by aleXXX on Monday 19/Mar/2001, @08:35
|
how about Qt::pointingHandCursor ?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KuickShow for KDE 2.1
by Carsten Pfeiffer on Monday 19/Mar/2001, @14:39
|
That's the netscape one (aka the ugly one), right? ;) This one is used to show that you are able to "click" on something, e.g. a link, while in KuickShow, I need one showing that you can "move" something. Photoshop uses an open hand, and I'd like to use something similar.
I downloaded the other imageviewer as pointed out somewhere above and I'll probably use that one.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|