Re: KDE on Windows?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent

Re: KDE on Windows?
by Hi on Thursday 17/May/2001, @15:15

This is a good idea but it has to be done systematically, by creating some X-independent layer including system independent IPC and window manager layer. KDE for Windows will always be a toy, but I would like to see a framebuffer-based KDE.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE on Unix and other platforms
·   Also by Hi
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KDE on Windows?
by Spooq on Thursday 17/May/2001, @15:30

There is an X-independant layer. Its called Qt.

Spooq

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KDE on Windows?
by Rakko on Friday 18/May/2001, @14:44

But it's not X-independent unless you pay for the commercial version.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KDE on Windows?
by Justin on Friday 18/May/2001, @14:48

The original poster was talking about a Unix framebuffer version. In that case, Qt/Embedded would do just fine. The license is the same as Qt/X11.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KDE on Windows?
by nitpicker on Saturday 19/May/2001, @20:19

Actually Qt/X11 is licensed under two licenses, QPL and GPL, whereas Qt/Embedded is licensed only under GPL.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Feature freeze means that everyone has a bad feeling when they change something, almost nothing more." -- Stephan Kulow
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.