The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Native Win32 would be rather easy...
by Gary Greene on Friday 21/Sep/2001, @20:59
|
I'd like to see Qt ported as well. For two main reasons: 1) this would take 9/10ths of the BS out of porting apps from X11/Linux to Win32 MUCH easier 2) if the port is done correctly, it could open the door to a DOS based port. Think about it? FreeDOS is a decent little OS for the old DOS nut (all bet missing a bootmanager), but it lacks the user-friendly GUI environments that X11/Linux and MS products have. With a port of QT to Win32, the main task of porting to DOS becomes designing a few libraries instead of building an entire GUI toolkit, WM, etc.
These are only a few of my ideas.
Anywho, later.
Gary Greene <rei_0000@yahoo.com>
Chief Software Architect, S4 Inc. - Operating Systems Development Division
Grand Rapids, Michigan
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Native Win32 would be rather easy...
by Gary Greene on Friday 21/Sep/2001, @21:00
|
I'd like to see Qt ported as well. For two main reasons: 1) this would take 9/10ths of the BS out of porting apps from X11/Linux to Win32 MUCH easier 2) if the port is done correctly, it could open the door to a DOS based port. Think about it? FreeDOS is a decent little OS for the old DOS nut (all bet missing a bootmanager), but it lacks the user-friendly GUI environments that X11/Linux and MS products have. With a port of QT to Win32, the main task of porting to DOS becomes designing a few libraries instead of building an entire GUI toolkit, WM, etc.
These are only a few of my ideas.
Anywho, later.
Gary Greene <rei_0000@yahoo.com>
Chief Software Architect, S4 Inc. - Operating Systems Development Division
Grand Rapids, Michigan
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|