faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Well
by Rimmer on Friday 01/Jun/2001, @05:12
|
| 5-6 seconds is an exaggeration. However the time for applications such as KMail and Konqueror to load seems like an eternity to load compared to their Windows equivalent. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Well
by Matt on Friday 01/Jun/2001, @09:41
|
Konqueror never takes more than a second to load on all my machines (from 400MHz to 800MHz).
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Well
by Jos van den Oever on Friday 01/Jun/2001, @10:00
|
On my PII 267MHz with 256 Mb Konqueror 2.1.2 takes 7 seconds to load after having just closed it, while running almost no other applications. I'm using SuSE 7.1 with their 2.1.2 rpms.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Well
by Wilke Havinga on Wednesday 06/Jun/2001, @18:09
|
This is strange - I'm running on a Celeron 466 with 128 MB of memory, and it takes at most 1 second to start up, much less if another session is already open. My KMail got several folders and contains about 12000 mails in total. It takes about 3 seconds to start, which is quite long, but I guess it takes some time to load those index-files :-)
So there must be something wrong with your configuration or the RPMs are compiled without any optimization turned on (?)
I still find it strange that the speed differs so much on computers that are quite similar.
Btw. I compiled everything from source...but I understand not everyone wants to do that. Maybe RPM builders should get better instructions, or the makefiles should have faster 'default' settings?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Well
by Jos van den Oever on Thursday 07/Jun/2001, @06:45
|
It might be the X that is trying to load loads of fonts for each application that starts. I wonder how I can speed this up. I don't even have or need anti-aliased fonts.
Just for the fun of it, I'll try an optimized compile myself and report the speed.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
I'm not sure I believe you :)
by Rimmer on Tuesday 05/Jun/2001, @19:27
|
Even after loading konqueror a few times I can't get close to 1 second... I'm amazed that konqueror loads the first time in 1 second on your system.
What distribution and kernel are you using? SCSI or IDE hard drive?
Please tell us the secret!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
That's because it's already mostly loaded
by Chris Wong on Friday 08/Jun/2001, @15:38
|
That's probably because you already had most of it loaded. If you had enabled HTML viewing in Kmail, for example, khtml would already be loaded. On the other hand, starting up Konq without the khtml stuff loaded (by any KDE app) is much slower.
Chris
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: Well
by Jerry Ruhe on Saturday 02/Jun/2001, @15:00
|
Hard drive speed tweaks may be the answer. try this:
/sbin/hdparm -c1 -d1 -a1 -m16 -u1 /dev/hda
*note - the hda is the drive on my box... you may have a different device setting ie /dev/hdb or /dev/hdc ect
just a thought
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Well
by Micko on Tuesday 05/Jun/2001, @20:48
|
This helped me a LOT! Things start up at half the time now and XMMS has stopped distort sound when I start a new process.
Is there more tuneing that can be done? Was I just lucky that these parameters was right for my HD?
Take a look at the difference in testresults by Bonnie in attached file.
testresultat
0KB (802 bytes)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
