faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by dc on Saturday 09/Jun/2001, @19:36
|
It's just an example.
BTW, GnomeMDI for GNOME 2.0 supports Window-in-Window like QT/Winblow$ does. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Sunday 10/Jun/2001, @00:44
|
> BTW, GnomeMDI for GNOME 2.0 supports
> Window-in-Window like QT/Winblow$ does.
If I have anything to do with it, that shit is being removed. It's ugly as fuck.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by dc on Sunday 10/Jun/2001, @05:28
|
If you want to troll, go to Slashdot.
All the deprecated code is already removed from gnome-libs in CVS.
Only good code is left, which mean the window-in-window MDI mode (which is optional) is good code.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by Bernd Gehrmann on Sunday 10/Jun/2001, @14:41
|
He isn't trolling, he is fully right. Drawing
window decorations is the window manager's job.
Imitating that by the application will always
suck. It doesn't integrate with the window
manager's look and feel, it uses different
buttons for maximizing or closing windows, and
it doesn't adjust to the window manager's focus
policy.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by dc on Sunday 10/Jun/2001, @18:27
|
No, he isn't. The Window-in-Window mode is just one of the many modes in GnomeMDI.
You can also choose for the Toplevel or Tab mode.
So there's nothing one can complain about.
Besides, QT and KDE also do the Window-in-Window thing.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by Bernd Gehrmann on Sunday 10/Jun/2001, @19:06
|
Somehow I get the impression that gnome advocates
can not read. Here it is again:
>> BTW, GnomeMDI for GNOME 2.0 supports
>> Window-in-Window like QT/Winblow$ does.
>If I have anything to do with it, that shit is >being removed. It's ugly as fuck.
That's what you responded to. So you are
trolling, not him.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by dc on Monday 11/Jun/2001, @04:36
|
I don't believe him. How does he know that that code is "shit" and is being removed?
Link to mailing list archive please.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Some People Really Can't Read
by Martijn Klingens on Monday 11/Jun/2001, @08:42
|
> How does he know that that code is "shit" and is being removed?
He doesn't know any of those because he said neither of those! Re-read the original message again:
> > If I have anything to do with it, that shit is being removed. It's ugly as fuck.
He only sais that _IF_ he was concerned he'd vote to get Window-in-Window MDI out, not that someone actually decided to do so!
Also he _NEVER_ said the code was ugly, only that the Window-in-Window MDI itself is ugly.
*sigh* Please read what people say first and don't take everything personally. It would make your life so much easier...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Tuesday 12/Jun/2001, @07:45
|
How do I know it's shit?
I used it.
It's ugly.
It may be good code, but the end results are nothing to be proud of.
And your assertion that only "good code" is left in gnome-libs is just laughable.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Tuesday 12/Jun/2001, @11:22
|
Ignore the above post. It's posted by a troll who stole my nickname.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Tuesday 12/Jun/2001, @20:09
|
Oh no it wasn't
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Monday 18/Jun/2001, @13:36
|
Oh yes it was. Now shut up and go steal others' nicknames.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
