Re: Gideon Development Update

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Gideon Development Update
by dc on Sunday 10/Jun/2001, @18:27

No, he isn't. The Window-in-Window mode is just one of the many modes in GnomeMDI.
You can also choose for the Toplevel or Tab mode.
So there's nothing one can complain about.

Besides, QT and KDE also do the Window-in-Window thing.

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by dc
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Gideon Development Update
by Bernd Gehrmann on Sunday 10/Jun/2001, @19:06

Somehow I get the impression that gnome advocates
can not read. Here it is again:

>> BTW, GnomeMDI for GNOME 2.0 supports
>> Window-in-Window like QT/Winblow$ does.

>If I have anything to do with it, that shit is >being removed. It's ugly as fuck.

That's what you responded to. So you are
trolling, not him.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Gideon Development Update
by dc on Monday 11/Jun/2001, @04:36

I don't believe him. How does he know that that code is "shit" and is being removed?
Link to mailing list archive please.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Some People Really Can't Read
by Martijn Klingens on Monday 11/Jun/2001, @08:42

> How does he know that that code is "shit" and is being removed?

He doesn't know any of those because he said neither of those! Re-read the original message again:

> > If I have anything to do with it, that shit is being removed. It's ugly as fuck.

He only sais that _IF_ he was concerned he'd vote to get Window-in-Window MDI out, not that someone actually decided to do so!

Also he _NEVER_ said the code was ugly, only that the Window-in-Window MDI itself is ugly.

*sigh* Please read what people say first and don't take everything personally. It would make your life so much easier...

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Tuesday 12/Jun/2001, @07:45

How do I know it's shit?

I used it.
It's ugly.

It may be good code, but the end results are nothing to be proud of.

And your assertion that only "good code" is left in gnome-libs is just laughable.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Tuesday 12/Jun/2001, @11:22

Ignore the above post. It's posted by a troll who stole my nickname.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Tuesday 12/Jun/2001, @20:09

Oh no it wasn't

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Gideon Development Update
by me on Monday 18/Jun/2001, @13:36

Oh yes it was. Now shut up and go steal others' nicknames.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"We could write better than CORBA. Hic. In a day!" -- Preston Brown, Matthias Ettrich
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.