Re: Focus on Infusion

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Focus on Infusion
by Jamin Philip Gray on Friday 15/Jun/2001, @22:12

The interface looks much like Outlook, but it's functionality/architecture is quite different. I'm sorry you thought I was trolling. I'm a gnome developer and was trying to point out the architectural differences between Outlook and Evolution. I also keep up with KDE developments and have a special interest in coordination between the two groups.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE PIM
·   Also by Jamin Philip Gray
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Focus on Infusion
by no-control on Saturday 16/Jun/2001, @00:07

It's functionality is pretty much the same, it sends emails, receives them, does some stuff with calendars, tasks and addresses. :) Thankfully all the functionality I could ask for in a mailer :)

Camel is probably more modular than anything in Outlook, but it's just a clone of Javamail, or JMail or something like that.

And I'd not be surprised if Outlook isn't internally quite similar in ideas to Evolution, the only difference is, we don't know how Outlook is done :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"The trolls are only human and make mistakes too." -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.