faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Yipes!
by Casteyde on Wednesday 27/Jun/2001, @20:02
|
Mmmh. I don't think he meant building comercial
apps with free librairies. I think he was simply astonished by the mess these license questions are making... simply look at this thread ! Quite complicated in fact...
However, I disagree with the GPLing librairies. FSF seems to fear someone steals code, and want to reny LGPL. However, I personnaly still consider that as restrictive, and not conform to the original goal, that was liberty. Even if it allows comercial people to use free librairies.
Free movement is not a comercial war (even if there are more and more comercial distros), it's a philosophy and a fight against intellectual and information monopoly. So why even wondering about commercial apps ? |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Yipes!
by Steve Hunt on Wednesday 27/Jun/2001, @20:11
|
EXACTLY!!! It is ludicrous to have open source code, when the same organization can't work with it, much less any other organization. The GPL is great for some things, such as smaller independent programs. However, I don't understand why KDE is licensed under the GPL.
I'm not sure about this, but I think the reason that KDE is under the GPL is because the FSF, or some other organization yelled at the KDE people (as a whole) and influenced them to license the whole thing under the GPL. However, for such a large and diverse project such as KDE, the GPL is not the right solution IMHO.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Yipes!
by nap on Thursday 28/Jun/2001, @08:39
|
It seems more like KDE guys weren't aware, how fascistic license GPL really is. See for example.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-kde-list/1999-May/msg00024.html
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|