Re: Yipes!

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Yipes!
by Steve Hunt on Wednesday 27/Jun/2001, @20:11

EXACTLY!!! It is ludicrous to have open source code, when the same organization can't work with it, much less any other organization. The GPL is great for some things, such as smaller independent programs. However, I don't understand why KDE is licensed under the GPL.

I'm not sure about this, but I think the reason that KDE is under the GPL is because the FSF, or some other organization yelled at the KDE people (as a whole) and influenced them to license the whole thing under the GPL. However, for such a large and diverse project such as KDE, the GPL is not the right solution IMHO.

Related Links

·   Articles on Qt
·   Also by Steve Hunt
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Yipes!
by nap on Thursday 28/Jun/2001, @08:39

It seems more like KDE guys weren't aware, how fascistic license GPL really is. See for example.

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-kde-list/1999-May/msg00024.html

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Factories pollute too much, I want something good for the environment." -- Charles Samuels
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.