Re: KDE & Companies: Ask Trolltech Anything

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: KDE & Companies: Ask Trolltech Anything
by ac on Saturday 07/Jul/2001, @23:43

How does QCom compare to KParts?

Related Links

·   Articles on Feature
·   Also by ac
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KDE & Companies: Ask Trolltech Anything
by anonymous on Sunday 08/Jul/2001, @21:34

Like apples and oranges ;-)

Well, not entirely. KParts is a set of well-defined C++ interfaces for graphical embedding, based on the Qt object model, combined with accessing components through shared libraries.

QCom provides a new set of clean C++ interfaces as object model, independent from QObject, moc and friends. With different goals and different semantics (memory management is different, not MOC (->no signals/slots) and different introspection (and basically optional for components) . It has nothing to do with graphical embedding nor with shared libraries as-is (although QCom components (or plugins, as they call it) are usually contained in shared objects) .

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"My keyboard and synthesizers have a nice pile of dust on top of their covers." -- Carsten Pfeiffer
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.