Re: ActiveX vs (GNU Mono and DotGNU)

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: ActiveX vs (GNU Mono and DotGNU)
by GuyWhoActuallyCodesWithDotNet on Wednesday 11/Jul/2001, @13:34

I would like to point out a couple of things:

1) I love Linux - I am not here to bash it.

2) KDE may deliver ActiveX support today, but Microsoft delivered it years ago.

3) .Net, as you may or may not know, is in beta right now, and the framework, from what I can tell, is really quite stable. There isn't much to complain about. The Visual Studio IDE is still a little problematic, but I have been using it at work without much difficulty.

Anyway, it seems strange to me that a Linux guy would talk smack about beta software. That's pretty far along in the development stage considering the usual "something-0.0.0.0.0.1-pre-pre-alpha.tar.gz" that we're used to seeing.

Related Links

·   Articles on Konqueror
·   Also by GuyWhoActuallyCodesWithDotNet
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: ActiveX vs (GNU Mono and DotGNU)
by n on Wednesday 11/Jul/2001, @16:57

Look at the subject line.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Nobody will ever write that kind of HTML code!" -- The KHTML Team
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.