Re: Konqueror Gets Activ(eX)ated

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Konqueror Gets Activ(eX)ated
by Andy Fawcett on Tuesday 10/Jul/2001, @07:08

Okay, here is my 'take' on this subject...

Technically, I like what has been done here. I think the guys have done a wonderful job in a short space of time.

And I agree with WildFox's sentiments that it *could* help companies migrate over to KDE.

It's a shame that the implementation isn't portable, but with the absence of file formats and designs, it is going to be nearly impossible to implement this on a lot of operating systems :(

As a final point, I don't see it as a bad thing to embrace older/other technology with KDE. If work such as this allows (some) KDE users to access information that they couldn't before, surely that is a good thing? Sure, it would be better if *all* KDE users could use this technology, but 'some' has to be better than 'none'.

Just my 0.02 euros

Tap

Related Links

·   Articles on Konqueror
·   Also by Andy Fawcett
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Spare time? What's that?" -- Dirk Mueller
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.