Re: Rekall

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Rekall
by jsp on Monday 03/Sep/2001, @09:18

OK, then I got something wrong.
I thought your plan was to provide a base version of Rekall for free, while selling commercial plugins for it (I thought I read this somewhere before I started using it).
But of course you are free to change your strategies. I just wanted to be enlightened, for I'm using Rekall beta for my PhD and therefore want to know if I can count on it in the future.

Regards,
Juergen

Related Links

·   Articles on Applications
·   Also by jsp
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Rekall
by Shawn Gordon on Monday 03/Sep/2001, @09:22

The idea was to have a free basic version that didn't include nested forms or reports, something like that. And then sell the 'pro' version for about $80 USD. That might well still be the case, we just have been focused on finishing the app first.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Rekall
by jsp on Monday 03/Sep/2001, @09:40

That's what I meant.
I am very pleased to hear that you still think about it.
I think it's a good way to get a widespread userbase (and helpful feedback).
And believe me, I am the least who wouldn't pay $80 for a good, stable product (after having the chance to try it out) ;-)

Regards,

Juergen

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I guess my process varies from time to time." -- George Staikos
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.