Re: Miguel...

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Miguel...
by Marko Samastur on Friday 07/Sep/2001, @08:06

Look, can you tell me which part is so troubling for you to understand?

He said he wants AA support NOW. KDE has it, GNOME doesn't yet (stable one that is). Judging by your replies, even you agree with that, but for some reason you think you need to justify GNOME.

I have nothing against prereleases and I really can't see how you could misconstruct what I think in that way, but I really don't care. It has nothing to do with what was debated.

About second part...you yourself asked why anyone wouldn't want gnome libs and I told you. Because I have no use for it. Abiword (which was application discussed) works the same without it (right now). Someday it probably won't and then I might feel the need to have gnome libs too, but right now there's no such need.

So where did I complain? You probably mean the last paragraph with that but I haven't said anything developers don't think themselves. If they didn't think that, they would have nothing to do because their work would already be finished.

Please grow up.

Related Links

·   Articles on Community and Events
·   Also by Marko Samastur
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Miguel...
by Stof on Friday 07/Sep/2001, @12:02

> Look, can you tell me which part is so troubling for you to understand?

Can you tell me which part you don't understand?
I never offered a solution, I merely stated that GTK+ 1.2 has limited AA support now and that it will fully support AA in the future.
I never told him that it's a good solution for him.
But don't you think other people deserves the right to know about it?

> Someday it probably won't and then I might feel the need to have gnome
> libs too, but right now there's no such need.

Then what's your problem? It's not like anybody force you to use it.
And porting AbiWord to gnome-libs now will make porting it to GNOME 2.0 and Bonobo much easier, now that the AbiWord codebase is still relatively small.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Miguel...
by Marko Samastur on Friday 07/Sep/2001, @13:33

I'm sorry, but you really piss me off. You really like to argue, don't you?

No matter how benign I try to write it, you'll always find something to argue about. If you are such a tender spirit, what the hell are you doing on site where you know you'll find more than plenty of people who disagree with you.

Anyway, I've had enough. I'll just ignore you from now on which is too bad because at first you actually sounded reasonable.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Miguel...
by Stof on Friday 07/Sep/2001, @15:52

Oh and you think you don't piss me off? Whenever I try to prove that GNOME is not as inferior as you think, you find another reason to complain about.
If you want to ignore me, then fine, go ignore me. I don't care.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"In my free time I try to avoid computers as far as possible." -- Matthias Elter
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.